Support indie blogging--and keep it ad-free--by purchasing a G.M. book, below right.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Remember when Bill Kristol said Obama would have opposed Abraham Lincoln?

With William Kristol now entrenched at The New York Times, Barack Obama very much a strong favorite for the White House, and Rudy Giuliani, then the frontrunner now a total flop, let's return to this magical moment, less than a year ago. Kristol, on Fox, said that Obama would have opposed Lincoln in the runup to the Civil War -- while Rudy would have been Da Man.

"We're electing a war president in 2008," Kristol declared on February 11, 2007, just after Obama launched his campaign with a speech that included a call for an Iraq pullout. "If I can come back to Obama and Lincoln for just one second. Lincoln's 'House Divided' speech in 1858 was a speech saying we cannot live as a house divided on slavery and he implicitly says we'll have to fight a civil war if necessary on this. Obama's speech is a 'Can't we all get along?' speech -- sort of the opposite of Lincoln. He would have been with Stephen Douglas in 1858: Let's paper over these differences, rise above politics, and all get along. That's not Giuliani's mode." Here is the link:

1 comment:

щитовые дома said...

No doubt, the chap is certainly fair.

Дс 125

My anti-death penalty e-book

My anti-death penalty e-book
Click cover to read more on history, and current debate, in America.