tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4290152190457552426.post4390829263556165391..comments2023-11-07T05:29:51.839-05:00Comments on Pressing Issues: Shocker: 'NY Times' finally unleashes its bombshell McCain/female lobbyist storyGreg Mitchell http://www.blogger.com/profile/05627773627527089158noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4290152190457552426.post-64218859949171613552008-02-21T13:48:00.000-05:002008-02-21T13:48:00.000-05:00It is unwise to raise any issue of infidelity or s...It is unwise to raise any issue of infidelity or sexual straying regarding any candidate in any campaign whatsoever involving the Clintons. It's like taking a poke at a hornet's nest. <BR/> (Also, eight-year-old bombshells are usually duds -- cf. John F. Kennedy,Robert Kennedy, et al.)<BR/> Another anon. (We're prolific)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4290152190457552426.post-56537514010406839842008-02-21T12:41:00.000-05:002008-02-21T12:41:00.000-05:00McCain's "steep involvement" in the Keating 5? La...McCain's "steep involvement" in the Keating 5? Last night Bob Bennett, who was the chief cousel for the investigation of the Keating 5 said he investigated McCain for 1.5 years and his recommendation was to drop McCain because he did nothing wrong. This Democrat said the only reason the Dems kept him as part of the 5 was so it wouldn't be all Democrats and was a purly political move. <BR/><BR/>Oh, well, never mind the facts when it's so much easier to call it "steep involvement".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4290152190457552426.post-57705439009269429372008-02-21T12:39:00.000-05:002008-02-21T12:39:00.000-05:00McCain's "steep involvement" in the Keating 5? La...McCain's "steep involvement" in the Keating 5? Last night Bob Bennett, who was the chief cousel for the investigation of the Keating 5 said he investigated McCain for 1.5 years and his recommendation was to drop McCain because he did nothing wrong. This Democrat said the only reason the Dems kept him as part of the 5 was so it wouldn't be all Democrats and was a purly political move. <BR/><BR/>Oh, well, never mind the facts when it's so much easier to call it "steep involvement".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4290152190457552426.post-8113816420093194172008-02-20T21:58:00.000-05:002008-02-20T21:58:00.000-05:00Why now -- even though there's no smoking gun, run...Why now -- even though there's no smoking gun, running this story now instead of December is a HUGE favor to McCain. Either run it when it's ready, or not at all. Printing this hours after McCain clinched the nomination remind me of the Iran hostage being freed minutes after Reagan become president. Coincidence? I think not.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com