The magazine endorsed Obama in 2008 and now
here's their lengthy explanation in this coming week's issue, now online, for 2012. Better written and argued than most. Quite a detailed look and pros and cons, or make that prose. Excerpt:
The choice is clear. The Romney-Ryan ticket
represents a constricted and backward-looking vision of America: the
privatization of the public good. In contrast, the sort of public
investment championed by Obama—and exemplified by both the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the Affordable Care Act—takes to heart
the old civil-rights motto “Lifting as we climb.” That effort cannot,
by itself, reverse the rise of inequality that has been under way for at
least three decades. But we’ve already seen the future that Romney
represents, and it doesn’t work.
The reƫlection of Barack Obama is
a matter of great urgency. Not only are we in broad agreement with his
policy directions; we also see in him what is absent in Mitt Romney—a
first-rate political temperament and a deep sense of fairness and
integrity.
No comments:
Post a Comment