Important
NYT editorial up tonight takes on the embrace by lazy lawmakers of the myths promoted by gun nuts, particularly about how the ban on assault weapons "did not help." Of course, the ban was allowed to lapse partly due to such propaganda. The
Times provides ample evidence to the contrary. "The false statistics comfort members of Congress who fear the gun lobby
or their more conservative constituents, or both, and are blocking a new
and stronger ban on assault weapons proposed by Senator Dianne
Feinstein." Just a sample of the facts:
The information is there if Congress is interested. After the ban
expired, 37 percent of police departments reported noticeable increases
in criminals’ use of assault weapons, according to a 2010 report by the
Police Executive Research Forum.
In Virginia, the number of guns with high capacity magazines seized by
police dropped after they were included in the 1994 weapons ban, but
then rebounded sharply after the ban expired, according to a 2011 study
by The Washington Post. Maryland enacted its own more stringent ban on
assault weapons ban in 1994, and a 55 percent drop in assault pistols
from crime scenes was reported by the Baltimore police.
No comments:
Post a Comment