Thirty-three years ago I was in college and we shut down the school that spring over Kent State and the U.S. bombing of Cambodia. Now here's
an important piece in
The Atlantic drawing links between then and now--the Obama drone war. One point is that, as Williams Shawcross showed, the bombing made things worse in Cambodia and helped bring the Khmer Route to power. Now:
The thousands of people killed so far by drone strikes represent a
fraction of the several hundred thousand who died beneath the B-52s
between 1969 and
1975. But the level of fear and anger -- and the opportunity for
insurgent groups to harness those emotions -- cannot be so easily
calculated.
In the words of retired General Stanley McChrystal, the former
commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, one can't help but hear an echo
of Charles Meyer,
Richard Dudman, and other observers of the Cambodia campaign. "What
scares me about the drone strikes is how they are perceived around the
world,"
McChrystal said
last month. "The resentment
created by American use of unmanned strikes...is much greater than
the average American appreciates. They are hated on a visceral level,
even by people
who've never seen one or seen the effects of one."
1 comment:
Just wondering aloud why McChrystal (ret.) was unable or unwilling to speak out against drone strikes when he was in a position to (possibly) shape military policy. Why is it these guys apparently only develop a sense of morality when they are safely ensconced in the confines of academia?
Post a Comment