Facebook post by Robert Reich raising alarm--or at least asking for debate--on Syria, and domestic fallout.
We're about to go into Syria. I can't tell you at this point how, but
the U.S. is readying an offensive. We're rounding up allies, as we did
before we went into Iraq. The White House is preparing the American
people, as another White House did before Iraq. But doesn't this at
least deserve a real debate? The silence in America is deafening. Didn't
we learn anything from Iraq? Or, for that matter, from Vietnam?
I'm
as appalled as anyone by the Syrian regime and its use of chemical
weapons on its own people. But what exactly do we expect to achieve by
entering this fray? And at what cost -- to us, to the Syrian people, to
the tinderbox of the Middle East?
Normally I don't venture
into foreign policy, but foreign and domestic policy aren't easily
separated. At a time when almost one in four American children is in
poverty, when the middle class is struggling to make ends meet, when
inequality is widening, and we're dis-investing in infrastructure and
education, can we really afford what this initiative could easily
mushroom into? We have seen the power of the
military-industrial-congressional complex to get its way, to get the
dollars it wants, and to sway public opinion in the direction that will
be most profitable to it. At the very least, we deserve a full and frank
discussion of what the Obama Administration is about to get us into.
1 comment:
So naive. There's a reason why there is so little public debate on Syria. Which is that this is an incredibly complex situation. We have no idea what is going on with Assad, or the rebels. We have to trust Obama. I'm okay with that. I am not okay with journalists who make definitive claims for or against action in Syria, because I highly doubt that any journalist understands what's really going on. JR
Post a Comment