I missed the widely-linked and repeated Rose reports of "Global Cooling"--and its trending on Twitter, for gosh sake--but
now he's being debunked by actual experts. Wish he was right, of course.
CJR:
At Discover, Tom Yulsman uses a series of animated GIFs to illustrate the Rose’s data problems in a post titled, “With Climate Journalism Like This, Who Needs Fiction.”
The writers each issue a devastating and thorough critique of the
piece, but it’s worth nothing how much time is wasted on an author whose
reportage Plaitt calls “so ridiculously wrong it’s charitable to call
them ‘ridiculously wrong.’”
But as Yulsman points out, the complexity of climate-change science
leaves room for this kind of unverified attack: The correct argument is
full of nuanced analysis, which is not only harder to write—it’s harder,
as a reader, to absorb.
No comments:
Post a Comment